On 9/23/2008 5:12 PM, Johnny Stork wrote:
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 9/21/2008 8:51 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
[Pardon the spam; thought this new blacklist might be worth at
least trying.]
Apparently Barracuda will be publishing a free-to-use sender
blacklist called BRBL:
http://www.barracudacentral.org/rbl
Haven't tried it myself but thought it may be of interest.
FIW:
12 hr stats / tiny traffic trap box - no ham
I use a couple of DNSWLs to reject traffic from potential hammy IPs
RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM
1 RCVD_BARRACUDA 19721 83.30 83.46 8.00
2 HTML_MESSAGE 19480 82.35 82.44 40.00
3 URIBL_BLACK 19457 82.17 82.34 2.00
4 RCVD_IN_XBL 18429 77.83 77.99 0.00
5 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 17009 71.83 71.98 0.00
6 URIBL_IVMURI 15851 66.94 67.08 0.00
7 URIBL_JP_SURBL 15090 63.73 63.86 0.00
8 RCVD_IN_PBL 14382 60.74 60.87 0.00
9 LOCAL_PYZOR_CHECK 13881 58.62 58.75 0.00
10 RDNS_NONE 13790 58.28 58.36 18.00
11 DOS_OE_TO_MX 11351 47.94 48.04 2.00
12 GENERIC_IXHASH 10772 45.49 45.59 0.00
13 URIBL_OB_SURBL 10705 45.21 45.30 0.00
14 URIBL_AB_SURBL 9125 38.54 38.62 0.00
15 URIBL_SC_SURBL 8882 37.51 37.59 0.00
16 URIBL_RHS_DOB 8880 37.50 37.58 0.00
17 LOCAL_IXHASH 7897 33.35 33.42 0.00
18 MIME_HTML_ONLY 6936 29.33 29.35 16.00
19 RDNS_DYNAMIC 6924 29.24 29.30 0.00
20 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 6905 29.17 29.22 2.00
Spam detection seems good - no idea how it does with HAM
How did you get this list ?
http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats-1.0.txt
