On 9/21/2008 8:51 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
[Pardon the spam; thought this new blacklist might be worth at
least trying.]

Apparently Barracuda will be publishing a free-to-use sender
blacklist called BRBL:

  http://www.barracudacentral.org/rbl

Haven't tried it myself but thought it may be of interest.


FIW:

12 hr stats / tiny traffic trap box - no ham
I use a couple of DNSWLs to reject traffic from potential hammy IPs

RANK    RULE NAME               COUNT  %OFMAIL %OFSPAM  %OFHAM
   1    RCVD_BARRACUDA          19721    83.30   83.46    8.00
   2    HTML_MESSAGE            19480    82.35   82.44   40.00
   3    URIBL_BLACK             19457    82.17   82.34    2.00
   4    RCVD_IN_XBL             18429    77.83   77.99    0.00
   5    RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET  17009    71.83   71.98    0.00
   6    URIBL_IVMURI            15851    66.94   67.08    0.00
   7    URIBL_JP_SURBL          15090    63.73   63.86    0.00
   8    RCVD_IN_PBL             14382    60.74   60.87    0.00
   9    LOCAL_PYZOR_CHECK       13881    58.62   58.75    0.00
  10    RDNS_NONE               13790    58.28   58.36   18.00
  11    DOS_OE_TO_MX            11351    47.94   48.04    2.00
  12    GENERIC_IXHASH          10772    45.49   45.59    0.00
  13    URIBL_OB_SURBL          10705    45.21   45.30    0.00
  14    URIBL_AB_SURBL          9125     38.54   38.62    0.00
  15    URIBL_SC_SURBL          8882     37.51   37.59    0.00
  16    URIBL_RHS_DOB           8880     37.50   37.58    0.00
  17    LOCAL_IXHASH            7897     33.35   33.42    0.00
  18    MIME_HTML_ONLY          6936     29.33   29.35   16.00
  19    RDNS_DYNAMIC            6924     29.24   29.30    0.00
  20    RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL       6905     29.17   29.22    2.00


Spam detection seems good - no idea how it does with HAM


Reply via email to