ok, the rule-QA results are in: http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20080916-r695772-n&rule=%2FTD_NOWRAP&srcpath=rulesrc%2Fsandbox%2Fjm%2F20_basic&g=Change
MSECS SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME WHO/AGE 0.00000 0.1669 0.0000 1.000 0.77 0.01 T_PR_TD_NOWRAP_BAT 0.00000 0.1684 0.1352 0.555 0.65 0.01 T_PR_TD_NOWRAP so T_PR_TD_NOWRAP_BAT doesn't lose much in the way of hitrate, well worth it. --j. Randal, Phil writes: > I should make clear that PR_TD_NOWRAP does hit some ham here, so perhaps > it would be better named __PR_TD_NOWRAP. > > Over the last week here, the figures are > > mxo: > > PR_TD_NOWRAP_BAT 1094, no fps > PR_TD_NOWRAP only 324, over 300 ham > > mx1: > > PR_TD_NOWRAP_BAT 1236, no fps > PR_TD_NOWRAP only 271, over 250 ham > > Cheers, > > Phil > > -- > Phil Randal > Networks Engineer > Herefordshire Council > Hereford, UK > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kenneth Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 15 September 2008 18:39 > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Erroneous doubled letters in subject > > --On Monday, September 15, 2008 10:36 AM +0100 Justin Mason > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > good tip! I've just added PR_TD_NOWRAP and PR_TD_NOWRAP_BAT to test > > these out... > > Cool! I've added it as a test rule in my environment and will bump up > the score once I see how it goes. > > For others looking for the rule, see here: > > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/rules/trunk/sandbox/jm/20_bas > ic.cf?revision=695394&view=markup>
