OK.  I'll probably change it likewise, depending on how it does on our
corpora...

Randal, Phil writes:
> I should make clear that PR_TD_NOWRAP does hit some ham here, so perhaps
> it would be better named __PR_TD_NOWRAP.
> 
> Over the last week here, the figures are
> 
> mxo:
> 
> PR_TD_NOWRAP_BAT    1094, no fps
> PR_TD_NOWRAP only    324, over 300 ham 
> 
> mx1:
> 
> PR_TD_NOWRAP_BAT    1236, no fps
> PR_TD_NOWRAP only    271, over 250 ham 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Phil
> 
> --
> Phil Randal
> Networks Engineer
> Herefordshire Council
> Hereford, UK
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kenneth Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 15 September 2008 18:39
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Erroneous doubled letters in subject
> 
> --On Monday, September 15, 2008 10:36 AM +0100 Justin Mason
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> > good tip!  I've just added PR_TD_NOWRAP and PR_TD_NOWRAP_BAT to test 
> > these out...
> 
> Cool! I've added it as a test rule in my environment and will bump up
> the score once I see how it goes.
> 
> For others looking for the rule, see here:
> 
> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/rules/trunk/sandbox/jm/20_bas
> ic.cf?revision=695394&view=markup>

Reply via email to