On 22.07.2008 06:28 CE(S)T, Dallas Engelken wrote:
Every Hetzner customer using the same DNS by default? Yeah, that indeed
looks like these DNS servers are being blocked by the BL operators (see
my previous post). Most likely not only URIBL, but every major BL out
there...
No, there are those NS addresses and I guess many customers have turned
them around in the past as there were problems with the DNS servers'
reliability. They seem to be solved for some time.
I have looked, and there are no ACLs on 213.133.0.0/16 whatsoever, so
its not coming from the uribl mirror side.
Could those DNS servers be monetizers? Have you (Yves) even tried manual
lookups to see how the ISP DNS server is responding? Do this and report
your results..
$ dig @213.133.100.100 unclassified.de.multi.uribl.com A
; <<>> DiG 9.2.4 <<>> @213.133.100.100 unclassified.de.multi.uribl.com A
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 57701
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;unclassified.de.multi.uribl.com. IN A
;; Query time: 149 msec
;; SERVER: 213.133.100.100#53(213.133.100.100)
;; WHEN: Tue Jul 22 19:53:07 2008
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 49
I don't know what this output means, as it looks all like commented out.
Does it say anything at all?
--
Yves Goergen "LonelyPixel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Visit my web laboratory at http://beta.unclassified.de
