Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 23:17 +0200, Matthias Leisi wrote:
Yves Goergen schrieb:
What do you mean? My mail server uses the DNS servers of the computing
centre. What SpamAssassin does, I don't know. The IP addresses are:
The same as everyone else... Sic.
# cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 213.133.100.100
nameserver 213.133.99.99
nameserver 213.133.98.98
nameserver 213.133.98.97
Ah, Hetzner. I had a lot less problems since I started to run my own:
main:~> cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 127.0.0.1
Every Hetzner customer using the same DNS by default? Yeah, that indeed
looks like these DNS servers are being blocked by the BL operators (see
my previous post). Most likely not only URIBL, but every major BL out
there...
I have looked, and there are no ACLs on 213.133.0.0/16 whatsoever, so
its not coming from the uribl mirror side.
Could those DNS servers be monetizers? Have you (Yves) even tried manual
lookups to see how the ISP DNS server is responding? Do this and report
your results..
$ dig @213.133.100.100 unclassified.de.multi.uribl.com A
Those NS IPs are not reachable from here, so I cant test to see how they
respond.
--
Dallas Engelken
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://uribl.com
