On 14.06.08 14:53, Greg Troxel wrote: > I've found that SA works well by default, except that I'm really > intolerant of any spam in my inbox, so I use thresholds that others > consider unreasonably low. I retrain on all spam and all ham daily > (moving uncaught spam to a spam.manual group, letting correctly-tagged > spam stay in spam groups, and moving false positives to the right > place). This is fairly fast because already-learned mail is reasonably > quickly skipped. > > Recently I paid attention more and spiffed up my config, and two things > made a big difference: > > enabling razor2 (just installing the perl package)
enablink most of network checks highers efficiency. Razor, pyzor, DCC, URI blacklists... but you need them installed and for DCC you need local DCC server if you process more than 200k mails daily. > adding every legitimate host that accepts mail for me from the > internet to trusted_networks (an example is mail.netbsd.org). This > enables address-based blacklist checking on the previous hops. > -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
