Karsten:

2008/5/13 Karsten Bräckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>  > Yup. Did you whitelist your servers? If you don't do it, SA doesn't
>  > know how to tell a legit bounce from UBE-generated bounces.
>  >
>  > You should have something like
>  > whitelist_bounce_relays my.server.name other.server.name
>  > in your local.cf.
>
>  True, and the OP did. He included another header snipped, showing
>  ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE hitting.
>
>
>
>  > Then you'll start to notice how bounce notifications start to get
>  > tagged as spam.
>
>  This is not true, however. VBounce will add a mere 0.1 or 0.2 to the
>  score, which hardly can be seen as "tagging as spam". The purpose of
>  VBounce is to *identify* backscatter. Not to treat it as spam. Please,
>  let me re-iterate what I have posted in here a bunch of times
>  already... :)

Well, you're right. I didn't express myself clearly. However, I have a
heavily modified vbounce2.cf in the /etc/spamassassin/ folder, which
assigns a default score of 7 so many bounce messages, since we don't
accept foreign bounces here.

>
>  $ grep -A 2 procmail /usr/share/spamassassin/20_vbounce.cf
>
>  # If you use this, set up procmail or your mail app to spot the
>  # "ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE" rule hits in the X-Spam-Status line, and move
>  # messages that match that to a 'vbounce' folder.
>
>   guenther
>
>
>  --
>  char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
>  main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
>  (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
>
>

Anyway, thanks for pointing out the real aim of VBounce. I lost it
completely, and now you've got me thinking if what I'm doing is wrong.

Regards,


Luis
-- 
_____________________________________

GNU/GPL: "May The Source Be With You...

 Linux Registered User #448382.
_____________________________________

Reply via email to