I checked the debug result of my a --lint and got:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ spamassassin 2>&1 -D --lint | grep ounce
[13492] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::VBounce from
@INC
[13492] dbg: config: fixed relative path: /var/lib/spamassassin/
3.002004/updates_spamassassin_org/20_vbounce.cf
[13492] dbg: config: using "/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/
updates_spamassassin_org/20_vbounce.cf" for included file
[13492] dbg: config: read file /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/
updates_spamassassin_org/20_vbounce.cf
This seems right, yes ?
Erik
On May 13, 2008, at 8:14 AM, Erik Dasque wrote:
Anyone ? Do you get the same analysis with the attached message that
I got ? Is my VBounce setup wrong then ?
Erik
(did my message get ignored because of the text attachment ?)
On May 12, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Erik Dasque wrote:
Hi all,
I am having trouble with VBounce. I think I followed the FAQ to the
letter yet most of the backscatter still ends up in my mailbox. For
example, if I analyze the attached sample email (which I received
this morning), I get the following:
[ .... ]
Spam detection software, running on the system
"li9-234.members.linode.com", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
root for details.
Content preview: Your message did not reach some or all of the
intended recipients.
The e-mail account does not exist. Check the e-mail address or
contact the
recipient directly to confirm the address. "Devon Roy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [...]
Content analysis details: (-2.0 points, 3.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
-2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to
1%
[score: 0.0000]
0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-
list
As you see, no bounce related analysis. However some messages get
filtered out as bounce (just not the one attached and quite a few
of its bretheren) which tells me it's at least working a bit :
X-Spam-Report: * 1.9 URIBL_AB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in
the AB SURBL blocklist * [URIs: bambinidimanina.org] * 1.5
URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL blocklist
* [URIs: bambinidimanina.org] * 2.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an
URL listed in the URIBL blacklist * [URIs:
bambinidimanina.org] * 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam
probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * 0.1
CRBOUNCE_MESSAGE Challenge-response bounce message * 0.1
ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE Message is some kind of bounce message
Any idea for me ?
Erik
<sample-vbounce.txt>
