Thanks for your answer the spamd -L was bad, without everything works fine,
especially the NixSpam plugin!
After your and Anthonys last mail I understand the reason for the different
scores in the output. Of course the lower score was already in the mail, don't
forget I took a scanned mail from the imap directory.
The lower score cames from the spamd -L (no network test), the higher score came
from "spamassassin < 2701." with network test.
Sorry for the confusion and thanks to all for your help!
Best regards,
Alex
Btw: Slox means Suse Linux Enterprise with OpenExchange.
Jonas Eckerman wrote:
age85 wrote:
we have a default slox 9 installation, please have a look at the attached
output. We can see two different spam scores in one message.
I can't see that you get two scores in one message in the output you
attached.
You atteched *one* multipart message. That single message only had one
score, 14.5.
One of the *parts* attached to the message is an message/rfc822 partr,
which also happens to have a spam score. But this score has nothing to
do with the encapsulating multipart message and should be ignored by
anything filtering based on spam score.
It looks like a system has flagged a message as spam based on the score
14.5, then built a completely new message that contains a spam report
and the flagged message. The system probably did this because it as
configured to do it.
> We receive the message with the lower spam value in the header.
Does this mean that you never received the message you included in your
post?
> What's the reason for this?
Your system is probably configured to act like that. Since I have no
idea what a default slox 9 installation is, I have no idea as to how
your configuration looks.
> What happens with the higher value?
If you never receive mails with high scores they are probably rejected,
discarded or bounced. Hopefully not bounced.
Regards
/Jonas
