On 09.04.08 05:47, age85 wrote:
> we have a default slox 9 installation, please have a look at the attached
> output. We can see two different spam scores in one message. We receive the
> message with the lower spam value in the header. What's the reason for this?
> What happens with the higher value?

> Received: from localhost by mail.DOMAIN.de
>         with SpamAssassin (version 3.1.9);
>         Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:19:13 +0200   
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.9 (2007-02-13) on mail.DOMAIN.de
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=14.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_99,HTML_40_50,
>        
> HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TITLE_EMPTY,IXHASH,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_JP_SURBL,
>         URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SC_SURBL autolearn=no version=3.1.9


> Received: from mail.DOMAIN.de ([unix socket])
>         by mail (Cyrus v2.2.3) with LMTP; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:22:45 +0200
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.9 (2007-02-13) on mail.DOMAIN.de
> X-Spam-Level: ***
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_95,HTML_40_50,
>         HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.9

most of differences come from URIBL_* and IXHASH, both of those are network
checks which usually start hitting some time after spam starts spreading
(is must be reported to get to blacklist and hash databases).

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
It's now safe to throw off your computer.

Reply via email to