On 09.04.08 05:47, age85 wrote: > we have a default slox 9 installation, please have a look at the attached > output. We can see two different spam scores in one message. We receive the > message with the lower spam value in the header. What's the reason for this? > What happens with the higher value?
> Received: from localhost by mail.DOMAIN.de > with SpamAssassin (version 3.1.9); > Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:19:13 +0200 > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.9 (2007-02-13) on mail.DOMAIN.de > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=14.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_99,HTML_40_50, > > HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TITLE_EMPTY,IXHASH,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_JP_SURBL, > URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SC_SURBL autolearn=no version=3.1.9 > Received: from mail.DOMAIN.de ([unix socket]) > by mail (Cyrus v2.2.3) with LMTP; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:22:45 +0200 > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.9 (2007-02-13) on mail.DOMAIN.de > X-Spam-Level: *** > X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_95,HTML_40_50, > HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.9 most of differences come from URIBL_* and IXHASH, both of those are network checks which usually start hitting some time after spam starts spreading (is must be reported to get to blacklist and hash databases). -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. It's now safe to throw off your computer.