Jo Rhett writes: > On Mar 29, 2008, at 3:21 AM, Justin Mason wrote: > > the AWL is keyed on email address and /16 of the sending IP > > address, so > > this may warrant more investigation. could you post the Received hdrs > > from the spam that hit the AWL, and a ham that properly hits the AWL? > > I still believe that self<->self would make a good exemption for AWL. > > Sorry, I don't the original messages any more. (I looked) But it > wouldn't surprise me if the /16 matched. The mail I send myself is > usually from Wifi or my phone carrier's GSM network, but accepted via > SMTP AUTH on the local machine. So which address are you using?
hmm, I'm not sure. It depends on your trusted_networks setting. try running "spamassassin -D" and see what it logs... --j. > Here's an example. > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: from mail.netconsonance.com ([unix socket]) > by triceratops.netconsonance.com (Cyrus v2.3.9) with LMTPA; > Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:14:34 -0700 > X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.3 > Received: from [10.178.18.103] (m4a0e36d0.tmodns.net [208.54.14.74]) > (authenticated bits=0) > by mail.netconsonance.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m31KE4ui014296 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 13:14:27 -0700 (PDT) > (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netconsonance.com > X-Spam-Flag: NO > X-Spam-Score: -0.72 > X-Spam-Level: > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.72 tagged_above=-999 required=3.8 > tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.44, AWL=0.720] > From: "Jo Rhett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: test awl > Date: 01 Apr 2008 13:14:00 -0700 > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-Mailer: ChatterEmail+ for Treo 6xx/700p (3.0.8) > Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- > from the cell phone of Jo Rhett > Network/Software Engineer > Network Consonance > > > > -- > Jo Rhett > Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source > and other randomness
