> >> It should use X-Spam-Relays-External. Still a common minconception that > >> untrusted == external.
> > can you explain why it should use *-external instead of *-untrusted? On 19.03.08 20:47, Henrik K wrote: > Inspired by this thread I submitted this, which should explain it: > > https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5856 trusted_networks should be a bit broader than internal_networks. So, there may be trusted hosts that are not internal, but no internal netowrks that are untrusted. In such case, if the first external host is trusted, it should _not_ be checked against any blacklists etc., just because it is trusted. That's imho why it's *-untrusted, not *-external -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Boost your system's speed by 500% - DEL C:\WINDOWS\*.*
