On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Loren Wilton wrote:
tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, DCC_CHECK=2.17, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,You could probably take bayes_99 up to very nearly 5 points quite safely IF your bayes database is well trained.
And if you're vexed by spams from Argentinian ISPs that BAYES is trained to recognize, then add a DNSBL lookup for IP addresses in Argentina and add a meta rule combining that and BAYES_99 for the goal...
Possibly: describe BL_COUNTRY_AR_1 Mail client in Argentina header BL_COUNTRY_AR_1 X-Relay-Countries =~ /AR/i score BL_COUNTRY_AR_1 0.5 meta AR_SPAM BL_COUNTRY_AR_1 && (BAYES_80 || BAYES_99) score AR_SPAM 10 -- John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED] key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The yardstick you should use when considering whether to support a given piece of legislation is "what if my worst enemy is chosen to administer this law?" ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 68 days until the Mars Phoenix lander arrives at Mars
