On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 10:14 +0100, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote: > Le Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:57:55 +0100, > Karsten Bräckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > > At 13:51 20-02-2008, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote: > > > >http://pastebin.com/m61564e4 > > > > That's not a default SA header. X-Spam-Checker-Version is missing, and > > that X-Spam-Status is missing autolearn and version. Whatever calls > > SA, you want to check with that. > > Amavisd-new is calling spamassassin. > > > > Amavisd-new I assume, looking at the Received header right before the > > X-Spam stuff. And Amavisd-new is, what inserts these headers, too. It > > is not SA. > > But the spamassassin config is read from /etc/spamassassin ? Yes. But this is not related to your issue, since in your OP you mentioned "more and more" spam with such a header. X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 required=5 tests=[none] So SA obviously works in the general case. Again, the header has been added by Amavisd-new, and that's where you need to dig. SA merely processes the mail. It's Amavis that adds the headers, it's Amavis that decides if a mail be scanned or not, and that likely enforces a timeout until it continues processing your mail and maintains its own whitelists, etc. You should go check your Amavis config and logs for any error messages regarding these specific mail. In particular, the tests=[none] has been added by Amavis, and it tries to tell you something that way. Sorry, I'm not an Amavis user. guenther -- char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
