Le Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:57:55 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 14:40 -0800, SM wrote: > > At 13:51 20-02-2008, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote: > > > > >http://pastebin.com/m61564e4 > > That's not a default SA header. X-Spam-Checker-Version is missing, and > that X-Spam-Status is missing autolearn and version. Whatever calls > SA, you want to check with that. Amavisd-new is calling spamassassin. > > Amavisd-new I assume, looking at the Received header right before the > X-Spam stuff. And Amavisd-new is, what inserts these headers, too. It > is not SA. But the spamassassin config is read from /etc/spamassassin ? > > > > The message hits RDNS_NONE, HTML_MESSAGE, URIBL_WS_SURBL, > ^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > URIBL_JP_SURBL, URIBL_OB_SURBL, URIBL_SC_SURBL, URIBL_BLACK, > > URIBL_RHS_DOB. The total score is 12.6. > > > > Are you using SURBL ( http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SURBL )? > > That's rather irrelevant. :) Emmanuel does not get *any* hit, whereas > he definitely should have at least HTML_MESSAGE triggering, unless he > disabled it. I didn't disabled any SA tests. > > guenther > > Thanks. -- Emmanuel Lesouef DSI | CRBN t: 0231069671 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
