Matt Kettler writes: > In general I'm somewhat averse to systems with undocumented or vague > policies in SA. Case in point, razor used to be disabled by default due > to a rather vague policy about "high volume" use, that didn't really > define what that volume was.
+1. We haven't decided *not* to remove Spamhaus usage from the base ruleset yet... it just hasn't come up in discussion again. So nobody should take the remaining inclusion of Spamhaus as any kind of indication that we approve of such policies. --j.
