Dallas Engelken wrote:

Superb. Thats all you had to do in the first place without raising a stink.
Aww, but it's so much more fun to post an inflammatory rant at the start of a message. :-)

<insert comment about any sports team sucking here... preferably a baseball team.>

If SA wants to completely remove uribl.com tests because we dont allow the heavy hitters to query the public mirrors, thats their choice.

Although, the usage policy for Spamhaus (http://www.spamhaus.org/organization/dnsblusage.html) doesnt prevent inclusion of RCVD_IN_SBL in SA.
Personally, I've got no kind of problem with this kind of volume limiting, as long as the thresholds are reasonable enough that all but the most businesses can use them.

However, I do think URIBL should try to come up with a solid policy about what the volume limits are, what the zone transfer fees are, etc, and document it somewhere on your website.

In general I'm somewhat averse to systems with undocumented or vague policies in SA. Case in point, razor used to be disabled by default due to a rather vague policy about "high volume" use, that didn't really define what that volume was.




Reply via email to