Hi Mouss,
At 15:03 29/12/2007, mouss wrote:
But they are not listening on the same IP:port, so you should see they
have different arguments (-n 127.0.0.1:25 ...).
My postfix is configured to listed on the jail-IP. This part of the
tool works fine. The issue is not with postfix.
As I said, cat sample-spam.txt | spamc [args] show the SA header
added, but dont detect GTube signature.
And there Postfix is not used...
that's because lmtp now uses the same code as smtp, so the program name
is what selects the protocol. I guess a command line argument would have
achieved the same goal. but I don't remember the dicussion.
In fact, in the previous version of postfix, lmtp-laurent was working great.
The issue just came from Wietse...
for SA, just use amavisd-new. It can also do antivirus check, but if you
want to reject infected mail, then you need to run amavisd-new as a
proxy_filter (before the queue). If you really want this, then configure
amavisd-new to listen on multiple sockets and one of them will be a
proxy_filter for AV checks only. while you can run SA at the same time,
this is not recommended (if it takes time, the connection will timeout,
... etc).
alternatively, use
- clamsmtp as a proxy_filter to reject infected mail
clamsmtp, I dont know this one. If it does not listen the port itself, why not.
Else, I planned to use clamav-milter, but wanted to finish with the
Messaging protection stack first.
- amavisd-new as a content_filter to run SA (and why not, to also run
another AV).
In either case, you don't need to run spamd, as long as you don't want
per-user Bayes. If you want per-user Bayes, then you should run
spamc/spamd at delivery time (except if this is just a gateway, but then
per user Bayes requires a lot of work...).
Do you mean spamc is not a caller to spamd? That's what I undertood..
Brgrds
