would perhaps be useful to see a spamassassin -D --lint ? Regards,
--[ UxBoD ]-- // PGP Key: "curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B // Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B // Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philipp Snizek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark Rigby-Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 12:49:26 PM (GMT) Europe/London Subject: Re: spamd throughput issues You use Bayes? Have you tried turning off auto_expire? From my expierence this can cause significant performance issues. Moreover, have you tried turning off bayes? without bayes scanning too a quarter of a second per email on a 2cpu, 8GB standard i686 arch, sa compiled as 32-bit app. Philipp > On 9 Dec 2007, at 21:40, Steven Stern wrote: >> Have you tried running a local caching name server? That can cut >> down on times to do repetitive name lookups. > > > Yes indeed, it's something we've always had on mail servers even > before we had SpamAssassin, for exactly that reason. > > Thanks, > mrj > -- > Mark Rigby-Jones, System Operations Manager > CI-Net, Network House, Langford Locks, Kidlington, OX5 1GA > CI-Net is the trading name for Community Internet plc > A company registered in England and Wales number 3155758 > t: 01865 856009 m: 07747 862201 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > w: www.ci-net.com > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
