On 26.07.07 15:16, Nico Prenzel wrote: > what I need to know about SpamAssassin is: > Does SpamAssassin score the Content-Transfer-Encoding type "binary" > differently as other types?
I don't think so. > I've got the problem that I don't get anything other than > "Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary" for every mail/attachment out of my > Lotus Domino interface to spamd. > > Of course, the original smtp stream of the incoming mails arrive with > different content-transfer-encodings (as BASE64). But Lotus Domino > internally formats it to binary format before I can capture it with any > API! In such case you should do the filtering before mail reaches domino server. That will require machine between lotus and world, where you can store copies of all (suspicious) mail to some folder on the, and feed them to spamassassin from there. However in such case you need to look at that folder once in a time... > So, would it be a problem to transfer all file attachments formated as > "Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary" to spamd instead of other > content-transfer-encodings? If you run spamassassin on a mail fetched from domino, you can train it on mail fetched from domino. But I think that some important informacions may be lost by the conversion domino does, so I'd be careful. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. One OS to rule them all, One OS to find them, One OS to bring them all and into darkness bind them
