Andy Dills wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Yet Another Ninja wrote:

Guys

These are NOT AV signatures to be updated every day/hour, whatever

Hammering the site won't make it any better and not help to keep it going.

Seems some ppl still haven't understood that hammer-leeching spoils it for
everyone and themselves.

People are still getting PDF spams?

I'm finding with a current version of SA and the sane security clamav signatures, that none have gotten through for a few days now.

Do we really need a PDFinfo at this point?
Yes. Definitely.

I'm only using the signatures with the spamassassin plugin because I found them to be too invasive. I dont allow anyone to block a mail at SMTP level just because it contains ONE sentence. The sanesecurity signatures also contain a LOT of single sentence rules which are too risky for me... For example just becuase a mail contains '(ii) Email ticket number' I dont want to block it.. but it will, according the the current scam.ndb...

Thats why I only use these rules for scoring and I definitely also want the pdfinfo scores in addition... And.. It took them quite a while to score on the new encrypted pdfs while they were already detected by the pdfinfo plugin

Matt

Reply via email to