> On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:20:12PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > On 13.07.07 09:15, Matt Kettler wrote: > > > It should only match a missing header. > > "missing header" doesn't mean "the header doesn't exist", btw. It's a > subtle difference, please see below. > > > bug 5207 should be reopened then... > > Nope. [...] > The header "exists:header_name" test really converts into: > header_data =~ /./ > > which requires that there be a character in the header_data.
aha. On 13.07.07 12:51, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > I'll put this in the bug for future reference. :) good, thanks. Could you also please change the description to "missing or empty" to avoid confusion for next time? (maybe Missing subject would help too, but the "Missing Subject: header" is really confusing imho) -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
