Robert Schetterer wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Fairbrass schrieb:
I'm running PDFInfo 0.3 with SA 3.1.8 and it works fine for me - and I'm
even running it on Windows! :)
Cheers,
Jeremy
"Suhas Ingale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote in message
news:!&[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<news:!&[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
Hello,
I am trying to run PDFInfo plugin with SA 3.1.7. SA registers the
plugin successfully but does not scan the PDFs in the emails.
According to Dallas Engelken (Creator of PDFInfo) , The MIME parser
in SA is not seeing a PDF attachment on this message.
Has anyone tried running PDFInfo plugin with 3.1.7 version?
Hi, after having good results in the beginning
with pdfinfo ,
no one of the following pdf spam was catched/marked
i am now using
clam and Sanesecurity to eleminate pdf spam.
It seems that the pdf spam mutates so fast
that the recent concept of PDFInfo plugin
isnt enough to catch/mark, so i think a solution like fuzzy ocr is
needed here
Spam in other attach file types ( doc etc ) may follow soon.
That is what concerns me more, if I start opening up every attached
file, parsing out text, parsing out images (so I can parse out the text)
and then running SA against everything I parse out, it's gonna get hairy
real fast. I can absolutely see doc, rtf, etc coming next.
Considering we deal with more PDF and Doc Ham than PDF and Doc spam, it
will become a major resource hog fast. I don't want to being running
plugins extracting text and images from docs, then text from images from
docs, on 40,000+ messages a day.
There has to be a better way.
DAve
--
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos
for other non-international holidays, but nothing for
Veterans?
Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible.
