Any other thoughts on this? I got another 5-6 spams this morning that were scored 0 by Bayes. It's dragging down the hits from other rules!
omehegan wrote: > > I'm running SA 3.2.1 with Postfix, routing mail to it through spamd/spamc. > I have a site-wide Bayesian database that I trained some time ago with a > few hundred hams, and then since then I've trained spam into it anytime I > received a false negative. With the recent influx of PDF and stock spam, > I've been updating rules and tweaking settings to get SA to catch them. I > noticed something interesting - all the spam I've gotten in at least the > last few days has scored 0 on Bayes. That's causing SA to drop the > message's score by 2.6 points, throwing other filters off-balance, so to > speak. I'm wondering if this is happening because I've been dutifully > teaching these stock spam messages into the database. They're full of > nonsense words, and although I think I've been told on this list that it's > ok to submit them, it seems like that could reduce the Bayes reliability. > Or, maybe I just need to refresh the database with a slew of new ham > messages. > > Attached is a spam I got today, which got good hits in other tests but 0 > probability in Bayes. Any suggestions on how to remedy this would be > appreciated. Thanks! > > http://www.nabble.com/file/p11451717/spam.txt spam.txt > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Bayes-suddenly-scoring-everything-at-0-tf4031385.html#a11472459 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
