guenther schrieb:
Unfortunately, the example iXhash.cf of (current) version 1.0 is rather
scarce when it comes to the definitions. I'd wish for these to become as
informative again as they used to be. FWIW, these verbose descriptions
and comments have been the reason for me to pick 2 out of 3 lists in the
first place, long ago. (Which doesn't mean I am not re-evaluating this
decision. In fact, the third one seems to be highly accurate, too --
granted, based on some brief, non-exhaustive tests...)
Revision 23 of your plugins old home claims this:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/iXhash?action=diff
* ix.dnsbl.manitu.net: Uses iX Magazine's spam as datasource.
* nospam.login-solutions.de: *Manually* verified stuff, fed by
spamtraps run by LogIn & Solutions AG.
* nospam.login-solutions.ag: Lots of stuff, but *automatically*
categorized and contributed.
So, the most important question is: Does this still hold true?
Günther,
those comments have been changed to today's because:
- They're not true any more for nospam.login-solutions.de; they are fed
from 'high quality' input
- They're to long: Older SA version have a limit of 50 chars I wasn't
aware of at first
I promised in an earlier reply to Per that I'll add some more info to
website and archive but give me some time as $iXhash ne $dayjob
Dirk
