On 7/2/2007, "Nix" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If you wanted to replace all other scoring mechanisms with the Bayes DB, >you'd need a second Bayes DB for this, anyway, or you'd need the tokens >corresponding to typically negative-scoring rules to have values which >cannot appear in the body of an email. Anything else would enable spammers >to force both FPs and FNs by customizing spam appropriately to include >suitable NO_FOO/YES_FOO values. That's why the data is being passed in as a second reference, nothing to do with the message. Seems to be working well, but there's some optimization to include.
