-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dallas Engelken schrieb: > Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote: >> Hi! >> >>> We just caught one: >>> >>> Content analysis details: (5.0 points, 4.0 required) >>> >>> pts rule name description >>> - ---- ---------------------- >>> - -------------------------------------------------- >>> 0.6 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record >>> (softfail) >>> 0.4 BAYES_60 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 60 to 80% >>> [score: 0.7404] >>> 2.2 TVD_SPACE_RATIO BODY: TVD_SPACE_RATIO >>> 0.9 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP >>> address >>> [201.32.227.251 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] >>> 0.9 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL >>> [201.32.227.251 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] >> >> Jun 27 14:50:03 vmx80 MailScanner[4491]: Message l5RCnxP8019756 from >> 212.127.254.149 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) to quicknet.nl is spam, >> SpamAssassin (not cached, score=24.191, required 5, BAYES_50 0.00, >> BODY_EMPTY 0.50, GMD_PDF_BAD_FUZZY 20.00, GMD_PDF_HORIZ 0.25, >> GMD_PDF_STOX 1.00, PROLO_NO_URI 0.01, RCVD_IN_WHOIS_BOGONS 2.43) >> >> Dallas rocks! >> > > The cats out of the bag now! :) > > More details on this will be made available later today hopefully. > hi @ll, i tested http://sanesecurity.com/clamav works too
- -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen Best Regards Robert Schetterer https://www.schetterer.org Germany -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGgm53fGH2AvR16oERAgVnAJ4xfN0pP6h+nazMPqjn2EHum/PGogCfZM72 so+pup+/0xyYcYKx6jkTlas= =ik2u -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
