JT DeLys wrote:
One comment that I'll share: After reading the list, wiki, general web,
etc I got the clear message that lint+debug-ing is a wise/necessary step.
It wasn't immediately clear to me that these 'failures' weren't real
problems (that's why I'm asking here, of course). Is there some
guidance/consistency to differentiating between real problems and such
warnings? I'm guessing there is, somewhere. But, for a new-ish user,
it's not always clear.
When you run a lint (without debug enabled) and get no errors, and
haven't noticed that something isn't working, you're usually OK. If you
do get errors from a lint, debug might tell you why, or someone on the
mailing list might be able to tell you why based on the debug output.
With sa-compile, or pretty much any other sa-* program, if it tells you
it completed successfully it probably did.
Daryl
- Re: getting lots of "giving up on regexp" on ... Daryl C. W. O'Shea
-
