On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 17:31 +0000, Duane Hill wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Jason Frisvold wrote: > > > On 6/21/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'd just use sa-update on all of them. You could do sa-update on one > >> and then rsync the files around, though, if you wanted. > > > > If you're daring, you can try an NFS mount as well. Although, with > > either of these (rsync or nfs), doesn't SA need to be restarted or at > > least HUPed to read the new rules files? > > Yes. Otherwise, spamd would still be using the previously loaded rules. > > I'm not sure if the OP is using sa-compile or not. I would assume the > compiled rule could be transfered over to other servers as well. Thus, > avoiding the running of sa-compile on every server used. Not sure, though. > I only have two servers and just run everything separately myself.
Hi I am using Spamassassin as a module in MailScanner If I dont risk getting blacklisted for too many queries , I would run sa-update on all servers. Anyway I think I have to restart MailScanner on update Thanks Ram
