Hi!
Hi, Raymond, I don't have any URIBL rules firing up (SA 3.2.0 from source here, most of the other relevant info is in the header of the mail I sent before to test). Where did you get them?
X-Prolocation-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=14.999, required 5, BAD_URI 1.50, CM_META_HK_NOW 2.50, CM_SPACED_DATE 0.50, PROLO_BLACK_DNSBL 3.00, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 0.50, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 1.50, RAZOR2_CHECK 0.50, SPF_PASS -0.00, URIBL_JP_SURBL 4.00)
Most likely since we get SURBL updates and so earlier then most of you do. Could be timings issues.
Bye, Raymond.
