Jason Haar wrote: > Since upgrading from SA-3.1* to 3.2.0, we have discovered that it > appears most small New Zealand businesses run mail servers on DSL > links with PTR records of the format "NN-NN-NN-NN.isp.carrier.nz". > Hence they end up with 2.2 points > (FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D,FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB,RDNS_DYNAMIC) added without > any real effort. That plus their sputty HTML mails pushes them into > the 5-7 range. > > I know SA isn't really doing anything wrong, but are people in other > countries seeing this too? If so, it may imply the default scores are > too high?
I'm not using those particular rules, but the mail-server setup you describe is fairly typical - and still wrong. They need to ask the provider for a proper reverse DNS entry, or use the providers SMTP-server as a relay. /Per Jessen, Zürich
