Nix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (And, let's be blunt, the pure this-word-is-spammy recognition part of > FuzzyOCR is much less smart than the Bayesian system already present > in SA: FuzzyOCR should really use the Bayesian system to determine the > spamminess of words, I suppose...)
Or even just act as a MIME part 'decoding' system (like Base64) and feed all words it finds in images into Bayes, along with all other text in the mail, rather than generating a score itself.
