Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
here is header lines from a mail that a qmail server received from
autehnticated user:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on
SuSE-101-64-minimal
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.3 required=5.0
tests=NO_REAL_NAME,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=3.1.8
Received: from p5498acaa.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO xxxxxxx)
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by xxxxxx with ESMPTA; 23 May 2007 15:05:04 -0000
Note that default qmail does not report any auth status; the only
qmail patch I know about uses ESMPTA for auth'd messages and SMTP
otherwise.
Somebody broke qmail auth support in 3.2.0 via r447014 back in
September. Apparently there's no test case for qmail and its semi-colon.
Never mind, looking into this further there's no problem with the change
made in r447014. The issue is qmail should be adding "with ESMTPA" and
not "with ESMPTA".
Daryl
