Am Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 20:09:42 schrieb Rosenbaum, Larry M.: > I am getting really poor performance with v3.2.0 compared with v3.1.8.
So do we. I'm quite sorry to bring this subject up again, but bayes expire is no explanation for us. We are running spamd 3.1x on a cluster of Debian Linux boxes, configured to do no outbound DNS, RBLs, bayes, SPF, whatever. It should simply do it's rules and nothing else. Usually I keep the boxes running on a load of about 5 and it was all quite well balanced. Yesterday I tried to switch to 3.2, configured likewise and had to downgrade soon afterwards for the load was exceeding 13. Same amount of email, same loadbalancing, same hardware. Of course, a new version with lots more rules is bound to be slower but that's really a killer for us since it effectively prevents us from upgrading at all. Is there any way to configure it so it may still yield OK results but be a bit, well, modest? Thanks... Stephan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
