Matt Kettler wrote:
Bill McCormick wrote:
I think my SA is missing some tests.
It's not.. besides, your bayes tore this one up. How many rules do you need?
I would hope the attached message would score something on obfuscate;
the part about anotomy; the man I'd like to be and the reference to my
girlfriend/wife.
Could somebody run this to see what you get?
I don't think there are rules for any of that.
[convincing examples snipped]
All of these are parts of normal conversational phrases present in nonspam.
OK, so they're parts of normal conversations. And geocites is a real
domain too, which scores fairly high since it's so prevalent in real
world spam. If this mail would have scored just 1 more point, we would
not even be having this conversation because SA would have deleted it.
Having a individual rules for this sort of thing that, when taken
together with other scores seems to be exactly what SA is all about.
Maybe some of my custom scores could be further raised and/or my
sa_delete setting lowered, but they seem pretty reasonable and in line
with what others are doing.
How many rules do I need? As many as it takes. What's the rule count up
to anyway?
Anyway, I think I'll try my hand at writing some rules for this.
Thanks
