Hi Mark,

Can you be more specific?

Was someone/thing changing your whitelist file?

Mark Adams wrote:
Hi All,

I would like to note that this problem has been corrected, and was due
to an external automatic updating source.

Thanks for all the help that has been provided.

Regards,
Mark

On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 03:50:52PM +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
I have changed my reporting template, and now get this information

Content analysis details:   (4.0 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.5 NO_RDNS                Sending MTA has no reverse DNS (Postfix variant)
  3.5 VOWEL_FROM_7           Impronouncable from header (7+ consecutive vowels)

So the whitelisting is definatly not working.
A lint of the file shows it is reading the cf file, and I have checked
the whitelist_from entry is correct a thousand times. Does anyone have
any idea what could be going on here?

On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 07:52:20PM +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
Thanks, I did run exactly that, and got the output that I posted. Do you
have any idea why I might be getting such a limited output?

What do you have set for reporting purposes in your local.cf file?

Regards,
Mark

On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:31:16PM -0500, maillist wrote:
Mark Adams wrote:
You could run: "spamassassin --test-mode < message", and see what it is scoring.

Hi There,

I have tried this, and get the below result.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C7710E.58A560A4--
hits=4.0 required=5.0 test=NO_RDNS,VOWEL_FROM_7

This does not show whitelist hits, should it?

Regards,
Mark

Yes, if you run "spamassassin --test-mode < message", it should show something like this:

Content analysis details:   (-104.0 points, 7.0 required)

pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-1.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
-100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
-3.0 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
                           [score: 0.0000]

-=Aubrey=-




--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:    http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"If you have an apple and I have  an apple and we  exchange apples
then you and I will still each have  one apple. But  if you have an
idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us
will have two ideas." -- George Bernard Shaw

Reply via email to