David Gibbs wrote:
--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Yes image spam can be a real pain.
While I agree that image spam is a PITA ... I have to wonder how ANYONE
in the right mind could fall for that garbage.
I mean, be real ... if the message you get contains an image, surrounded
by garbage text, and the image quality is worse than a 60's era
television picture, how hard is to figure out that the message is
questionable?
Half the image spam's I've read are so garbled, to avoid the ocr tests,
it's impossible to decipher what they are trying to pump & dump anyways.
david
Maybe there's real genus involved in this image spam. I have only
received a few of them because luckily BAYES_99 catches them all (maybe
I get on in 2 months). We use to try to decipher what the messages
were, just to see who could get it first. Plus, it reminded us of Atari.
sa-learn them, and they should go away
-=Aubrey=-
