Hi Guys, Eric: Thank you for your response. I am trying what you suggested. Yes I did mean X-Greylist and not X Greylist.
Of course after implementing it I also thought of testing what John warned about below. And indeed milter-greylist does not purge pre existing X-Greylist headers - I tested that as well. So John, thanks for mentioning that as well. I would assume though that Spamassassin would only look at the topmost X-Greylist header. If I do get it to work I think I will keep it till I start noticing an increase in spam due to X-Greylist headers being spoofed. Regards, Arjun Datta Great Gulf Homes / Ashton Woods Homes 416 441 1262 x2822 -----Original Message----- From: John D. Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 9:57 AM To: Eric A. Hall Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Rule based on X Greylist header On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Eric A. Hall wrote: > Assuming you mean "X-Greylist" instead of "X Greylist", something > like the following will either work or get you close: > > header L_MILTER_GREY X-Greylist =~ /^Sender succeeded SMTP Authentication/ > score L_MILTER_GREY -100 Be aware: unless milter-greylist strips off any preexisting X-Greylist headers, that solution is ripe for abuse. Spammers could trivially forge such a header. -- John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED] key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- There is no doubt in my mind that millions of lives could have been saved if the people were not "brainwashed" about gun ownership and had been well armed. ... Gun haters always want to forget the Warsaw Ghetto uprising, which is a perfect example of how a ragtag, half-starved group of Jews took 10 handguns and made asses out of the Nazis. -- Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Today: Albert Einstein's 128th Birthday
