From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Jim Maul wrote:
> > David Goldsmith wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Setup:    SA 3.1.8, Pyzor, Razor, DCC, iXhash
> >>     Botnet, FuzzyOCR 3.5.1, SARE rules, some misc rules
> >>
> >> This message got 0 points.  Does it score over 5 for anyone?
> >>
> >> http://members.cox.net/dgoldsmi/spam/lowscore01.txt
> >>
> > 
> > Content analysis details:   (8.6 points, 5.0 required)
> > 
> >  pts rule name              description
> > ---- ---------------------- 
> > --------------------------------------------------
> >  0.1 HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE   BODY: HTML link text says "click here"
> >  0.1 HTML_60_70             BODY: Message is 60% to 70% HTML
> >  0.1 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
> >  0.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_11_50  BODY: Razor2 gives confidence 
> between 11 and 50
> >                             [cf:  33]
> >  5.4 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 
> 99 to 100%
> >                             [score: 0.9992]
> >  0.3 MIME_HTML_ONLY         BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
> >  1.6 LINK_TO_NO_SCHEME      BODY: Contains link without http:// prefix
> >  0.1 CLICK_BELOW            Asks you to click below

Jim, Where did you get the LINK_TO_NO_SCHEME and CLICK_BELOW rules?

Thanks,

Giampaolo


> > 
> > Sure does.
> > 
> > -Jim
> > 
> > 
> 
> BTW, i forgot to mention that im running SA 2.64, razor and a few sare 
> rules only.  Bayes was the kicker here.  I <3 bayes ;)
> 
> -Jim

Reply via email to