From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Jim Maul wrote: > > David Goldsmith wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> Setup: SA 3.1.8, Pyzor, Razor, DCC, iXhash > >> Botnet, FuzzyOCR 3.5.1, SARE rules, some misc rules > >> > >> This message got 0 points. Does it score over 5 for anyone? > >> > >> http://members.cox.net/dgoldsmi/spam/lowscore01.txt > >> > > > > Content analysis details: (8.6 points, 5.0 required) > > > > pts rule name description > > ---- ---------------------- > > -------------------------------------------------- > > 0.1 HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE BODY: HTML link text says "click here" > > 0.1 HTML_60_70 BODY: Message is 60% to 70% HTML > > 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message > > 0.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_11_50 BODY: Razor2 gives confidence > between 11 and 50 > > [cf: 33] > > 5.4 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is > 99 to 100% > > [score: 0.9992] > > 0.3 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts > > 1.6 LINK_TO_NO_SCHEME BODY: Contains link without http:// prefix > > 0.1 CLICK_BELOW Asks you to click below
Jim, Where did you get the LINK_TO_NO_SCHEME and CLICK_BELOW rules? Thanks, Giampaolo > > > > Sure does. > > > > -Jim > > > > > > BTW, i forgot to mention that im running SA 2.64, razor and a few sare > rules only. Bayes was the kicker here. I <3 bayes ;) > > -Jim