-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Paul Aviles wrote:
> Matt, thanks for taking the time to answer me.
> 
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>> Erm.. that would disable RBLs in both sendmail AND spamassassin..
>> Clearly not what you want.
>   
> More confused... OK got the part that SA is only a labeling filter.  I made
> the mistake of implying that anyone using SA will also use procmailrc rules
> to rid of spam based on a score number like 10, seems like a good thing to
> do anyway..
> 
> The RBLS is sendmail actually discard the email so they are rejected. What
> is the purpose of SA using RBL's then if the emails will be rejected?

To clarify this part of your question:

No matter what MTA you use (sendmail, qmail, postfix, etc), if you use
RBL tests there, you generally will block any email connections that
come from an IP address that is on one of the DNS blacklists you are
using.  Pros are you reduce the message load and further processing
requirements on your server.  Cons are you may block valid emails
depending on the RBLs used and its harder to 'retrieve' a false positive
block since you don't have the message.

If you do not use RBLs with your MTA, you will accept the email (a lot
more spam) and then be able to filter it with SpamAssassin. In your
local.cf file is the skip_rbl_checks config option. It can be set 2 ways

skip_rbl_checks   1
- - means do not have SpamAssassin check RBLs for the IP addresses in the
  Received headers.  SpamAssassin will still run other rules but will
  not adjust the message score with regard to RBL presence

skip_rbl_checks   0
- - SpamAssassin will run the RBL checks that are defined in the
  20_dnsbl_tests.cf file.  You can add additional RBLs in your local.cf
   file
- - SpamAssassin does not directly block a messages because it is on an
  RBL, instead it assigns the associated number of points to the message
  score.  If the message score now exceeds your defined spam threshold,
  then whatever actions you are taking to block messages tagged as spam
  will apply here

Cons of doing RBL test and message blocking here is a lot more email has
to get filtered by SpamAssassin which needs hardware resources to do so.
Pros are any messages blocked by score elements from RBLs will be with
your quarantined messages (if you don't /dev/null them) and can be
retrieved from the quarantine if a user calls to complain that a message
wasn't received.

David Goldsmith
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3rc2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF4EdB417vU8/9QfkRArc8AKCXHWanNmt1BrRkxPGUMk9ATWaCBwCgmIHC
QIx8WoDsboUiRPyRi6wBxRE=
=ZAek
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to