DAve writes: >Justin Mason wrote: >> Theo Van Dinter writes: >>> I'm assuming that there will be a Google Summer of Code 2007 going on, and >>> that the ASF will be involved again. So it's a good time to start thinking >>> about things we'd like to put up as possible projects. >>> >>> We still have a number of items from last year that we could use again. >>> Anything else that we'd like people to code up? >> >> Also, any suggestions from outside the dev team? Anyone got good ideas >> for new SpamAssassin features that would be good to pay someone to work on >> for 3 months? >> >> --j. > >Maybe, several of us use MailScanner. MailScanner does not use spamc, it >loads SA directly. One of the features of MailScanner is called MCP or >Message Content Protection. MCP uses, or attempts to use, SA to do >specific targeted message content checking. Many people, we included, >would like to be able to use this but it seems there is always some >gotcha to having SA loaded in MailScanner twice. Problems with the >directory paths, rules in memory, etc. > >The ability to run SA with two totally different configurations in the >same application would very handy. Different rules for outbound mail vs >inbound mail, MCP(as in this user wants zero mail with the word "breast" >regardless of the rest of the message content) are just two examples. > >Contacting Julian on the MailScanner list would give far better examples >and details than I could.
cc'd Julian. This could definitely be done -- I didn't realise there was demand for it ;) This should probably be opened as a bug on the bugzilla, btw. is it already there? --j.
