I have a LOT of spam that is hitting with score in the teens despite
getting very low AWL scores.
In fact, of the 400 messages in my current SPAM folder, 77 have
negative AWL, some as high as -7.9 (38 have positive AWL scores)
for example, here are some headers of a message that scored -6.0 for
AWL but 8.8 overall (so would have scored 14.8 and been dev/null-ed
but for the AWL score:
------------=_45D2B46D.7995227F
Content-Type: message/rfc822; x-spam-type=original
Content-Description: original message before SpamAssassin
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from troycall.com (126.troycall.com [64.129.66.126])
by mail.covisp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9D5118B5E1
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:04:08 -0700
(MST)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:10:21 -0700
From: "Club Health" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Does Sams Club Offer Health Coverage In Your Area?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wtf is [EMAIL PROTECTED] doing in the AWL?
--
sometimes ascii is the best use of bandwidth... Tonya Engst
