On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 02:43:14PM +0000, Michael Connors wrote: > Content analysis details: (7.1 points, 5.0 required) > > 0.1 RCVD_BY_IP Received by mail server with no name > 1.7 SARE_MLB_Stock1 BODY: SARE_MLB_Stock1 > 1.7 SARE_PROLOSTOCK_SYM3 BODY: Last week's hot stock scam > 0.1 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML > 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message > 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML tag for a big font size > 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100% > [score: 1.0000] > > Is the [score: 1.0000] the total spam score for this email?
No. 1.0000 is the score that the Bayes system gave the message. The "message score" is listed above: 7.1. > I find it strange that it these get through as they are the first non-image > spams to get through more than a couple of times. The message scored 7.1 and your required score is 5, so it was marked as spam. It sounds like you're expecting SA to do something other than marking up the message, which it's not going to do. -- Randomly Selected Tagline: Girls just want to have fun - C. Lauper
pgpooPuujhyTB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
