urgrue wrote: > >> The auto-whitelist has nothing to do with anything that says >> WHITELISTED. >> >> The auto-whitelist will show up as a rule named AWL. Nothing else. >> >> That said, can you be VERY specific about what your headers say? >> >> Does it say USER_IN_WHITELIST? >> >> If so, check your whitelist_from and whitelist_from_rcvd entries. >> > > It says, precisely: > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=- tagged_above=-9999.0 required=5.0 WHITELISTED > > So if its not whitelist_from or the AWL, what can it be? That's nothing coming from spamassassin. There's no such thing as WHITELISTED in SA, so that must be an amavis thing.
Also, the lack of any score is a good hint SA didn't do it. All of SA's whitelists are just score modifiers. Spamassassin is always more specific than than just WHITELISTED. AFAIK, this is a complete list of whitelist rules for SA: USER_IN_WHITELIST USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST SUBJECT_IN_WHITELIST USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST USER_IN_DK_WHITELIST USER_IN_DEF_DK_WL USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO USER_IN_MORE_SPAM_TO USER_IN_ALL_SPAM_TO AWL note there are some other things with negative scores, like bonded sender, habeas coi, and hashcash, but none of these has rule names even remotely related to the word "white".
