Seems like you're right Jim... This server is efectively nat'ed and MX's for our domains on other servers are nat'ed too...
Looks like we have to configure all this stuff manually :-( It should be quite easy with TrustPath and TrustedRelays wiki's articles. In fact I'm afraid a lot of rules are completely misfiring because of this (DNSRBL, SPF, ALL_TRUSTED...) Thanx for your help -----Message d'origine----- De : Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : jeudi 8 février 2007 17:24 À : Stéphane LEPREVOST Cc : users@spamassassin.apache.org Objet : Re: ALL_TRUSTED rule fires despite no trusted_networks defined Stéphane LEPREVOST wrote: > We are actually checking the configuration of our SA installation (SA > 3.1.7 + qmail + qmail-scanner 1.25st + clamav running on SLES *) and > just saw a very weird thing : > > despite we don't have any 'trusted_networks' line in our local.cf > file, more than 50 000 received mails over 90 000 did fire the rule > ALL_TRUSTED ... > > Does someone knows why ? Because if you dont define trusted networks, SA guess at what it should be. Sometimes it gets this wrong...is your server nat'ed? You may have to define trusted networks manually. -Jim
