On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 18:46 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote: > On Tuesday, February 06, 2007 12:31 AM +0100 "Chr. v. Stuckrad" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So what really will be needed, would be a combination of > > Rules for 'illegal hostname in url' and something like > > the URIBLS to catch 'sytactically legal looking' obfuscations. > > (if such a thing is feasible) > > What about a meta rule that combines "string does not resolve" (ie. by DNS > lookup of the raw, obfuscated URL) and the presence of the words "remove" > or "replace"? > > You could also have a plugin that saves away illegal characters found in a > domain string and looks for one of those characters within some distance of > the URL in the message. > >
Good idea , I think you mean domainname instead of URL OTOH there could be genuine typos ? how to avoid Fp'ing that Fp's have become a bane nowadays. Today people send mails and then call up to make sure the mail has reached, or is not in spam folder Thanks Ram
