On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 06:33:40PM -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote: > If I read this right, it looks for an illegal domain character in the > domain component after the first dot. The new pattern puts a % after the > second dot.
fwiw, I put in a new test version which will catch the latest obfuscation, and I'm sure we can look forward to it changing again shortly. I don't really feel it's worthwhile, but if there isn't a rule there's a ton of discussion on the list about why there isn't a rule, and I'm tired of arguing. -- Randomly Selected Tagline: "Music is religion. Karaoke is a cult." - Bass Ale Commercial
pgp66iJwo9wY2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
