Matt Kettler wrote: > Monty Ree wrote: > >> Hello, list. >> >> I would like to ask some about bayes. >> >> If I have recevied ham mail which written ***SPAM***, So in order to >> train bayes this mail with sa-learn to ham, I forwarded this mail >> using outlook or outlook express to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and this mail would >> be saved at /var/spool/mail/ham. >> >> and if I execute like this, this would be meaningful or meaningless? >> > Meaningless. Forwarding the message created a new, completely different, > message, at least from a bayes perspective. It has new headers, and all > the mime sections were likely reformatted and re-encoded to outlook's > liking. While there's a lot of visual similarity when rendered by > outlook, the raw message is quite different. > >> # sa-learn --ham /var/spool/mail/ham >> >> If meaningless, Any good solution which like this? >> > I'm no outlook expert, but what you're looking for is a way to extract > the original message, with its original headers and mime sections. > > I think one quick and easy way to accomplish this is to make your outlook clients leave a copy on the server. When they report a spam message, and you want to learn it as such, go to the server, and learn it either from their inbox directly, or copy it "as is" to another file, and learn that one. This is by no means a long-term way to deal with this, but it's what I did/do.
-=Aubrey=-
