John D. Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, John Rudd wrote:
John D. Hardin wrote:
Or if you *really* want to be cruel, point it to a box where an SMTP
tarpit is running...
Wouldn't that cause legit mail to go to the tarpit?
If you were lax in setting this up, possibly. You'd want to have a few
*real* backup MX hosts in line before your very-low-priority tarpit.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liberals love sex ed because it teaches kids to be safe around their
sex organs. Conservatives love gun education because it teaches kids
to be safe around guns. However, both believe that the other's
education goals lead to dangers too terrible to contemplate.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
3 days until The 4th anniversary of the loss of STS-107 Columbia
We have 2 MX hosts and the second has 98% spam, buts its all very high
scoring spam and easy to stop. Does it make more sense to have something
like;
mx1 10 non.answering.host
mx2 20 answering host
mx3 30 answering host
mx4 40 non.answering.host
Do spammers look for a specifically weighted mx, eg always weight 20 -
or do they look for the lowest weighted?
